Market Gains in Dona Ana County, New Mexico, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 44
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Dona Ana County, New Mexico totaled $354,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Guadalupe L Garcia | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $2,659 |
22 | Preston S Tharp | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $2,518 |
23 | Lorenzo M Diaz | La Mesa, NM 88044 | $1,930 |
24 | Bobren LLC | Las Cruces, NM 88011 | $1,832 |
25 | Isidro Alvarez Jr | Salem, NM 87941 | $1,557 |
26 | Joe Corona | Anthony, NM 88021 | $1,507 |
27 | Everett Brawley | Hatch, NM 87937 | $1,412 |
28 | Holguin Farms Inc | Las Cruces, NM 88004 | $1,257 |
29 | Rancho Bonito De Alvarez LLC | Fayetteville, NC 28311 | $1,257 |
30 | Hector Mendoza | Garfield, NM 87936 | $1,205 |
31 | Robledo Farms LLC | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $1,110 |
32 | John Harlacker | La Mesa, NM 88044 | $1,107 |
33 | Keith S Franzoy | Hatch, NM 87937 | $1,035 |
34 | Agri-sun Inc | Mesilla Park, NM 88047 | $891 |
35 | Robert Berridge Jr | Garfield, NM 87936 | $856 |
36 | Charles Franzoy Jr | Hatch, NM 87937 | $581 |
37 | David J Madrid | Anthony, NM 88021 | $521 |
38 | Eulogio Ray Flores | Hatch, NM 87937 | $480 |
39 | Lorenzo F Guerra | La Mesa, NM 88044 | $466 |
40 | T E Watson Farms LLC | La Mesa, NM 88044 | $326 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”