Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Guadalupe County, New Mexico, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 82
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Guadalupe County, New Mexico totaled $1,421,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | James Robbins | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $24,290 |
22 | Jacks Inc | Newkirk, NM 88431 | $23,404 |
23 | Sunshine Mesa Ranch LLC | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $23,330 |
24 | Jt Land And Cattle LLC | Newkirk, NM 88431 | $22,091 |
25 | J & K Vicente LLC | Vaughn, NM 88353 | $21,932 |
26 | Traveling Waters Inc | Portales, NM 88130 | $20,729 |
27 | L Estevan Jaramillo | Encino, NM 88321 | $19,393 |
28 | Mckenzie Land & Livestock Company | Encino, NM 88321 | $17,189 |
29 | Karl Agar | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $15,990 |
30 | Steve Tapia | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $15,857 |
31 | Curtis L Kelling | Cuervo, NM 88417 | $15,484 |
32 | Hisel Family Trust | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $15,421 |
33 | Jose R Lucero | Anton Chico, NM 87711 | $13,217 |
34 | Ernest Copeland | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $10,421 |
35 | Metcalf Ranch LLC | Farwell, TX 79325 | $9,909 |
36 | R&r Cattle | Albuquerque, NM 87121 | $8,940 |
37 | Carlos Armendariz | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $8,279 |
38 | David L Kenyon | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $7,790 |
39 | Ralph J Sena | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $7,381 |
40 | Eduardo E Lucero | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $7,308 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”