Total Commodity Programs in Guadalupe County, New Mexico, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 43
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Guadalupe County, New Mexico totaled $39,813 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert Rivera | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $305 |
22 | Christopher Moya | Edgewood, NM 87015 | $305 |
23 | Richard D Cordova | Albuquerque, NM 87114 | $305 |
24 | Saiz Farm And Ranch LLC | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $304 |
25 | Lucille Serrano | Encino, NM 88321 | $264 |
26 | Apolonio J Jaramillo | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $264 |
27 | Santiago Catarino Lucero | Anton Chico, NM 87711 | $256 |
28 | Delfinia M Montano | Edgewood, NM 87015 | $248 |
29 | Ernesto Chavez | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $239 |
30 | John Padilla | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $206 |
31 | Vera M Elevario | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $206 |
32 | Josie Ulibarri | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $206 |
33 | Michael Muniz | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $198 |
34 | Larry Boylan | Santa Fe, NM 87507 | $173 |
35 | Esteban Villanueva | Anton Chico, NM 87711 | $173 |
36 | Marcos J. Baca | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $165 |
37 | Charlie Moya | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $140 |
38 | Fernando A Madero | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $132 |
39 | Ermelina Romero | Pecos, NM 87552 | $83 |
40 | Manuel R Ortega | La Loma, NM 87724 | $83 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”