Farm Subsidy information
Guadalupe County, New Mexico
Total Subsidies in Guadalupe County, New Mexico, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 115
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Guadalupe County, New Mexico totaled $3,135,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Thompson Cattle Company LLC | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $11,111 |
42 | Traveling Waters Inc | Portales, NM 88130 | $10,515 |
43 | Ralph J Sena | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $10,276 |
44 | Larry Boylan | Santa Fe, NM 87507 | $9,486 |
45 | Jt Land And Cattle LLC | Newkirk, NM 88431 | $9,022 |
46 | Michael Muniz | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $8,892 |
47 | Glennis Erramouspe | Clovis, NM 88101 | $8,679 |
48 | L Estevan Jaramillo | Encino, NM 88321 | $8,014 |
49 | J & K Vicente LLC | Vaughn, NM 88353 | $7,936 |
50 | William Ortiz | Newkirk, NM 88431 | $7,332 |
51 | Santiago Catarino Lucero | Anton Chico, NM 87711 | $7,274 |
52 | Dale Houlihan | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $6,903 |
53 | Rudy L Marquez | Encino, NM 88321 | $6,790 |
54 | Rick D Flores | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $6,725 |
55 | Earl J Sena | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $6,720 |
56 | Daniel L Chavez | Newkirk, NM 88431 | $6,627 |
57 | Saiz Farm And Ranch LLC | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $6,288 |
58 | Leroy Sandoval | Anton Chico, NM 87711 | $6,194 |
59 | Pete Marez | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $6,158 |
60 | , | $5,948 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”