Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Guadalupe County, New Mexico, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 87
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Guadalupe County, New Mexico totaled $1,982,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | V R & D Perez Ranch | Vaughn, NM 88353 | $185,934 |
2 | Bull Canyon Inc | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $151,225 |
3 | Hage & Webb Land & Cattle Inc | Garita, NM 88421 | $87,849 |
4 | Bryce Duggar | Cuervo, NM 88417 | $83,285 |
5 | Guy Coley Cowden | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $82,734 |
6 | James Robbins | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $68,217 |
7 | Shannon Kizer | Pep, NM 88126 | $67,599 |
8 | Vicente Ranch Co, Inc | Vaughn, NM 88353 | $64,831 |
9 | Moise Livestock Company LLC | Santa Fe, NM 87502 | $58,730 |
10 | Traveling Waters Inc | Portales, NM 88130 | $57,314 |
11 | Fuchs Cattle Company LLC | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $55,312 |
12 | Raymond Perez Ranch Partnership | Vaughn, NM 88353 | $53,938 |
13 | Jt Land And Cattle LLC | Newkirk, NM 88431 | $48,900 |
14 | Shafer Ranches Inc | Carrizozo, NM 88301 | $48,832 |
15 | A Spear Ranch LLC | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $43,679 |
16 | Thompson Cattle Company LLC | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $40,259 |
17 | Cary Crist | Texico, NM 88135 | $39,498 |
18 | Glennis Erramouspe | Clovis, NM 88101 | $39,467 |
19 | Jacks Inc | Newkirk, NM 88431 | $36,160 |
20 | J D Mcewen | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $34,113 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>