Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Guadalupe County, New Mexico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 101
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Guadalupe County, New Mexico totaled $2,148,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Shannon Kizer | Pep, NM 88126 | $143,498 |
2 | Vicente Ranch Co, Inc | Vaughn, NM 88353 | $142,645 |
3 | V R & D Perez Ranch | Vaughn, NM 88353 | $111,969 |
4 | Bryce Duggar | Cuervo, NM 88417 | $95,002 |
5 | Larry H Webb | Newkirk, NM 88431 | $81,040 |
6 | Guy Coley Cowden | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $76,381 |
7 | Hage & Webb Land & Cattle Inc | Garita, NM 88421 | $71,893 |
8 | Bull Canyon Inc | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $68,736 |
9 | Moro Ranch Company | Vaughn, NM 88353 | $67,096 |
10 | George Gonzales | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $66,507 |
11 | Jlj Cattle Co. LLC | Vaughn, NM 88353 | $55,069 |
12 | Shafer Ranches Inc | Carrizozo, NM 88301 | $51,297 |
13 | Moise Livestock Company LLC | Santa Fe, NM 87502 | $50,885 |
14 | Jose R Lucero | Anton Chico, NM 87711 | $48,805 |
15 | Fuchs Cattle Company LLC | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $42,727 |
16 | J D Mcewen | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $42,237 |
17 | Jacks Inc | Newkirk, NM 88431 | $40,883 |
18 | A Spear Ranch LLC | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $37,392 |
19 | Raymond Perez Ranch Partnership | Vaughn, NM 88353 | $36,395 |
20 | Randolph Huston | Rociada, NM 87742 | $35,240 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>