Total Commodity Programs in Guadalupe County, New Mexico, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 93
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Guadalupe County, New Mexico totaled $441,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jt Land And Cattle LLC | Newkirk, NM 88431 | $5,042 |
22 | Steve Tapia | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $5,035 |
23 | Curtis L Kelling | Cuervo, NM 88417 | $5,024 |
24 | M D Thompson | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $4,935 |
25 | Jbv Cattle Co. LLC | Vaughn, NM 88353 | $4,539 |
26 | Lance Vicente | Vaughn, NM 88353 | $4,437 |
27 | Louis Erramouspe | Clovis, NM 88101 | $3,688 |
28 | Paul A Alderete | Tijeras, NM 87059 | $3,017 |
29 | Tony Maestas | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $2,908 |
30 | Maestas Living Trust | Anton Chico, NM 87711 | $2,902 |
31 | Chance Lee Robbins | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $2,888 |
32 | Stephen A Branch | Espanola, NM 87532 | $2,862 |
33 | Sr 1 Acre Few Cattle Co | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $2,815 |
34 | Guy Coley Cowden | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $2,813 |
35 | Metcalf Ranch LLC | Farwell, TX 79325 | $2,800 |
36 | George W Mitchell | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $2,670 |
37 | Karl Agar | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $2,608 |
38 | Marietta Sullivan | La Loma, NM 87724 | $2,494 |
39 | Jose R Lucero | Anton Chico, NM 87711 | $2,493 |
40 | R&r Cattle | Albuquerque, NM 87121 | $2,258 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”