Total Commodity Programs in Guadalupe County, New Mexico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 171
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Guadalupe County, New Mexico totaled $3,450,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Maestas Living Trust | Anton Chico, NM 87711 | $17,081 |
42 | Sr 1 Acre Few Cattle Co | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $16,656 |
43 | Ricardo Burguete Inc. | Vaughn, NM 88353 | $16,339 |
44 | Marietta Sullivan | La Loma, NM 87724 | $15,788 |
45 | Karl Agar | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $15,272 |
46 | Chance Lee Robbins | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $14,152 |
47 | Jose R Lucero | Anton Chico, NM 87711 | $14,072 |
48 | Silvano Sisneros | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $13,449 |
49 | Milagro Ranches Resources Inc | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $13,151 |
50 | R&r Cattle | Albuquerque, NM 87121 | $13,113 |
51 | Ralph J Sena | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $12,900 |
52 | Stephen A Branch | Espanola, NM 87532 | $12,278 |
53 | Tony Maestas | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $12,269 |
54 | Earl J Sullivan | La Loma, NM 87724 | $11,918 |
55 | Eduardo E Lucero | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $11,743 |
56 | Arsenio C Sanchez | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $11,590 |
57 | John M Gonzales | Anton Chico, NM 87711 | $10,963 |
58 | Caprock Ranch & Cattle LLC | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $10,890 |
59 | Leo Muniz Jr | Encino, NM 88321 | $10,091 |
60 | Ray A Lucero | Anton Chico, NM 87711 | $9,868 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”