Total Commodity Programs in Guadalupe County, New Mexico, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 43
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Guadalupe County, New Mexico totaled $39,813 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | V R & D Perez Ranch | Vaughn, NM 88353 | $9,316 |
2 | Lance Vicente | Vaughn, NM 88353 | $4,183 |
3 | Guy Coley Cowden | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $3,539 |
4 | Bryce Duggar | Cuervo, NM 88417 | $3,383 |
5 | Raymond Perez Ranch Partnership | Vaughn, NM 88353 | $2,908 |
6 | Paul A Alderete | Tijeras, NM 87059 | $2,294 |
7 | George Gonzales | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $1,576 |
8 | Steve Tapia | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $1,122 |
9 | Sr 1 Acre Few Cattle Co | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $850 |
10 | Metcalf Ranch LLC | Farwell, TX 79325 | $833 |
11 | Jose R Lucero | Anton Chico, NM 87711 | $770 |
12 | Francisco Z Padilla | La Loma, NM 87724 | $711 |
13 | Ralph J Sena | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $575 |
14 | Justin Lee Lopez | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $561 |
15 | Marietta Sullivan | La Loma, NM 87724 | $544 |
16 | Trancito Sanchez | Anton Chico, NM 87711 | $536 |
17 | Eduardo E Lucero | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $520 |
18 | Martin Chavez | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $413 |
19 | Leo Muniz Jr | Encino, NM 88321 | $413 |
20 | Pete Marez | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $338 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>