Farm Subsidy information
Luna County, New Mexico
Total Subsidies in Luna County, New Mexico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 500
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Luna County, New Mexico totaled $83,208,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Martin Chavez-perez | Columbus, NM 88029 | $123,688 |
122 | Michael Orphey | Deming, NM 88030 | $123,390 |
123 | Chile River Inc | Salem, NM 87941 | $122,178 |
124 | Dean Milligan | Deming, NM 88030 | $120,821 |
125 | E W Nunn Jr | Deming, NM 88030 | $118,794 |
126 | Hal B Keeler | Deming, NM 88030 | $118,284 |
127 | Phyllis Speir | Eagar, AZ 85925 | $117,417 |
128 | Cow Springs LLC | Tyrone, NM 88065 | $116,846 |
129 | Lori Ann Lindsay | Deming, NM 88030 | $113,713 |
130 | Arroyo Farms LLC | Deming, NM 88030 | $111,917 |
131 | Ronald C Strain | Faywood, NM 88034 | $110,116 |
132 | Robert F Gobleck | Deming, NM 88031 | $107,359 |
133 | Monte Vista Farms | La Mesa, NM 88044 | $107,250 |
134 | Robert Pastran | Deming, NM 88030 | $104,637 |
135 | Sam Teague Estate | Phoenix, AZ 85004 | $99,358 |
136 | Jee Farm | Fairacres, NM 88033 | $96,517 |
137 | Adams Produce Incorporated | Hatch, NM 87937 | $95,252 |
138 | Stephen A Teague | Marietta, GA 30067 | $95,045 |
139 | Latrice T Thomas | Bedford, TX 76021 | $95,045 |
140 | Frank J Konyn Dairy | Escondido, CA 92027 | $94,081 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”