Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Quay County, New Mexico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 212
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Quay County, New Mexico totaled $4,822,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Shoe L Inc | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $250,000 |
2 | Ti Ranch Inc | Nara Visa, NM 88430 | $250,000 |
3 | Zia Agricultural Consulting LLC | Albuquerque, NM 87107 | $250,000 |
4 | T-4 Cattle Co LLC | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $250,000 |
5 | Mike Oden Cattle Co LLC | Prescott, AZ 86305 | $216,539 |
6 | Larry Young | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $140,084 |
7 | James O Bar - Land & Cattle LLC | Nara Visa, NM 88430 | $127,157 |
8 | Clay S Mimms | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $126,633 |
9 | Glen Franklin Cattle Company | House, NM 88121 | $103,777 |
10 | Rush Ranch Inc | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $86,571 |
11 | Perez Cattle Company LLC | Nara Visa, NM 88430 | $80,419 |
12 | Paul F Gibson | Bard, NM 88411 | $78,768 |
13 | Rush Land & Cattle Co Inc | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $76,409 |
14 | Rush Farms Inc | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $75,432 |
15 | D & J Farms | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $75,175 |
16 | Lyons Ranch | Cuervo, NM 88417 | $67,124 |
17 | James R Burns | Nara Visa, NM 88430 | $57,406 |
18 | Dennis Cattle Co Inc | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $56,707 |
19 | Bruhn Livestock, LLC | Logan, NM 88426 | $53,553 |
20 | Jack W Smith | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $52,811 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>