Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Rio Arriba County, New Mexico, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 191
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Rio Arriba County, New Mexico totaled $416,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Alfonso Chacon | Ojo Caliente, NM 87549 | $4,527 |
22 | Jake D Vigil | Dulce, NM 87528 | $4,411 |
23 | Osha LLC Dba Garcia Brothers | El Rito, NM 87530 | $4,213 |
24 | Donald E Martinez | El Rito, NM 87530 | $4,129 |
25 | Gary P Martinez | Ojo Caliente, NM 87549 | $4,058 |
26 | Ronald N Ulibarri | Alcalde, NM 87511 | $3,526 |
27 | Nathan J Duran | La Jara, NM 87027 | $3,459 |
28 | Esquibel Partnership Dba Esquibel Bros And Son | Tierra Amarilla, NM 87575 | $3,418 |
29 | Travis D Chavez Sr | Cuba, NM 87013 | $3,348 |
30 | Myra Vigil | Dulce, NM 87528 | $3,215 |
31 | Alonzo S Gallegos | Pena Blanca, NM 87041 | $2,731 |
32 | Nathaniel Herrera | Youngsville, NM 87064 | $2,684 |
33 | Gilbert L Martinez | Tierra Amarilla, NM 87575 | $2,669 |
34 | Moises A Morales | Canjilon, NM 87515 | $2,665 |
35 | Albert Branch | Coyote, NM 87012 | $2,585 |
36 | Garcia Lazy J Ranch | Espanola, NM 87532 | $2,539 |
37 | , | $2,525 | |
38 | Frieda Havens | Cuba, NM 87013 | $2,514 |
39 | Gallegos Ranch | El Rito, NM 87530 | $2,458 |
40 | Paul Martinez | Espanola, NM 87532 | $2,398 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”