Loan Deficiency in Roosevelt County, New Mexico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 524
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Roosevelt County, New Mexico totaled $9,984,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Kenneth Dixon | Nogal, NM 88341 | $16,375 |
142 | Mitchell Dairy Inc | Portales, NM 88130 | $15,800 |
143 | Clifton Gossett | Portales, NM 88130 | $15,705 |
144 | Gregg Gossett | Portales, NM 88130 | $15,589 |
145 | Buzard Farms Inc | Clovis, NM 88101 | $15,548 |
146 | Jo Ann Hays | Dora, NM 88115 | $15,480 |
147 | Gene Wayne Richards | Portales, NM 88130 | $15,298 |
148 | Stanley R Jones | Portales, NM 88130 | $14,821 |
149 | Monte Radcliff | Portales, NM 88130 | $14,737 |
150 | Greenfield Park Dairy | Clovis, NM 88101 | $14,689 |
151 | Adam L Anthony Estate | Elida, NM 88116 | $14,368 |
152 | Derral Stroud | Portales, NM 88130 | $14,054 |
153 | Gloria Ramey | Santa Fe, NM 87505 | $13,915 |
154 | Hardt Farm Partnership | Portales, NM 88130 | $13,898 |
155 | Mikel D Hays | Clovis, NM 88102 | $13,552 |
156 | Rodney Thetford And Francis L Thetford Revocable T | Portales, NM 88130 | $13,365 |
157 | Monte Best | Portales, NM 88130 | $13,309 |
158 | Ardel Incorporated | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $12,995 |
159 | Aj & Jm Golden | Portales, NM 88130 | $12,926 |
160 | J D & Myrle Hays Revocable Trust | Dora, NM 88115 | $12,283 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”