Farm Subsidy information
Sandoval County, New Mexico
Total Subsidies in Sandoval County, New Mexico, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 88
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sandoval County, New Mexico totaled $1,815,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hernandez Sons And Daughters LLC | Cuba, NM 87013 | $18,773 |
22 | Pueblo Of Jemez | Jemez Pueblo, NM 87024 | $16,964 |
23 | H Louis Wiese III | Cuba, NM 87013 | $16,638 |
24 | Fred D Lucero | Jemez Pueblo, NM 87024 | $12,965 |
25 | Jessica D Romero | Rio Rancho, NM 87144 | $12,853 |
26 | Horacio Sanchez | Cuba, NM 87013 | $12,576 |
27 | Steven F Sanchez | Albuquerque, NM 87107 | $12,034 |
28 | Viola M Garcia | Cuba, NM 87013 | $12,004 |
29 | Daniel Sanders | Cuba, NM 87013 | $10,695 |
30 | Jose Juarez | Pena Blanca, NM 87041 | $10,333 |
31 | Michael Brandon Trujillo | Ponderosa, NM 87044 | $9,838 |
32 | Pueblo Of Sandia | Bernalillo, NM 87004 | $9,653 |
33 | Joe L Reano | Kewa, NM 87052 | $9,424 |
34 | Nathan J Duran | La Jara, NM 87027 | $9,419 |
35 | Abenicio Casaus | Cuba, NM 87013 | $9,240 |
36 | Jared Taylor | La Jara, NM 87027 | $9,045 |
37 | Jonathan C Romero | Rio Rancho, NM 87144 | $8,979 |
38 | Kira A Loretto | Jemez Pueblo, NM 87024 | $8,871 |
39 | William Maestas | La Jara, NM 87027 | $8,654 |
40 | Joseph J. Sanchez And Sons Ranch LLC | Cuba, NM 87013 | $8,325 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”