Total Commodity Programs in Sandoval County, New Mexico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 318
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sandoval County, New Mexico totaled $1,152,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Alice R Castillo | Cuba, NM 87013 | $4,868 |
42 | Daniel Peshlakai | Cuba, NM 87013 | $4,709 |
43 | Eddie Pacheco | La Jara, NM 87027 | $4,560 |
44 | Kira A Loretto | Jemez Pueblo, NM 87024 | $4,522 |
45 | Michael Brandon Trujillo | Ponderosa, NM 87044 | $4,503 |
46 | Brian Patrick Sando | Jemez Pueblo, NM 87024 | $4,284 |
47 | Jimmy W Wagner | Los Ranchos, NM 87107 | $4,170 |
48 | Ramon T Trujillo | Ponderosa, NM 87044 | $3,953 |
49 | Steven F Sanchez | Albuquerque, NM 87107 | $3,922 |
50 | Anthony O Trujillo | Ponderosa, NM 87044 | $3,866 |
51 | Abenicio Casaus | Cuba, NM 87013 | $3,742 |
52 | David Erik Simpson | Cuba, NM 87013 | $3,733 |
53 | Joe L Reano | Kewa, NM 87052 | $3,701 |
54 | John D Romero | Jemez Pueblo, NM 87024 | $3,679 |
55 | Sherwin Pedro Sando | Jemez Pueblo, NM 87024 | $3,671 |
56 | Hernandez Sons And Daughters LLC | Cuba, NM 87013 | $3,273 |
57 | Leonard James Magdalena | Jemez Pueblo, NM 87024 | $3,104 |
58 | Timothy Ronald Sanchez | Bernalillo, NM 87004 | $2,728 |
59 | George R Garcia | Albuquerque, NM 87105 | $2,714 |
60 | Donald James Garcia | Albuquerque, NM 87114 | $2,656 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”