Farm Subsidy information
Sandoval County, New Mexico
Total Subsidies in Sandoval County, New Mexico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 700
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sandoval County, New Mexico totaled $16,142,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Alice R Castillo | Cuba, NM 87013 | $40,757 |
62 | Michael Brandon Trujillo | Ponderosa, NM 87044 | $39,957 |
63 | Kira A Loretto | Jemez Pueblo, NM 87024 | $38,393 |
64 | Walter Cristobal | Bernalillo, NM 87004 | $38,024 |
65 | Pueblo Of Santa Ana | Santa Ana Pueblo, NM 87004 | $37,856 |
66 | Henry Sandoval | Cuba, NM 87013 | $37,430 |
67 | Augustine Business Enterprises | Corrales, NM 87048 | $36,654 |
68 | Jim & Becky Mullane | Pena Blanca, NM 87041 | $36,390 |
69 | Mariano L Lucero | Jemez Pueblo, NM 87024 | $35,983 |
70 | Santa Ana Pueblo | Bernalillo, NM 87004 | $34,507 |
71 | Agripina Lucero | Albuquerque, NM 87107 | $34,078 |
72 | Antonio Lucero | Jemez Pueblo, NM 87024 | $33,710 |
73 | , | $33,254 | |
74 | Sombrio Ranch LLC | Cuba, NM 87013 | $32,238 |
75 | Watson Castillo | Cuba, NM 87013 | $31,202 |
76 | Horacio Sanchez | Cuba, NM 87013 | $30,988 |
77 | John D Romero | Jemez Pueblo, NM 87024 | $29,569 |
78 | Jonathan C Romero | Rio Rancho, NM 87144 | $29,442 |
79 | Donald James Garcia | Albuquerque, NM 87114 | $28,992 |
80 | Fred Rivera | Pena Blanca, NM 87041 | $27,121 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”