Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in San Juan County, New Mexico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 334
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in San Juan County, New Mexico totaled $1,072,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Betty J Yazzie | Newcomb, NM 87455 | $1,914 |
102 | Terry Begay 31847 | Newcomb, NM 87455 | $1,854 |
103 | Harrison Benally | Shiprock, NM 87420 | $1,772 |
104 | Colorado Hay Makers Inc | Cortez, CO 81321 | $1,766 |
105 | Lena T Nakai | Shiprock, NM 87420 | $1,764 |
106 | Nellie George 22133 | Shiprock, NM 87420 | $1,753 |
107 | Billy Yazzie 125775 | Shiprock, NM 87420 | $1,744 |
108 | Pauline Mccauley | Farmington, NM 87499 | $1,739 |
109 | Bertina M. Mccauley | Farminton, NM 87499 | $1,717 |
110 | Lorraine M Deal | Navajo, NM 87328 | $1,657 |
111 | Beverly Maxwell | Shiprock, NM 87420 | $1,644 |
112 | Mary Louise Johnson | Shiprock, NM 87420 | $1,639 |
113 | Louise Q Mark | Navajo, NM 87328 | $1,621 |
114 | Frank John Jr | Teec Nos Pos, AZ 86514 | $1,620 |
115 | Leonard John | Shiprock, NM 87420 | $1,619 |
116 | Dorothy Sam 24568 | Newcomb, NM 87455 | $1,613 |
117 | John H Lapahie 24133 | Newcomb, NM 87455 | $1,587 |
118 | , | $1,580 | |
119 | Harvey Pete | Bloomfield, NM 87413 | $1,557 |
120 | Helen J Yazzie 105382 | Sanostee, NM 87461 | $1,520 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”