Emergency Conservation Program in San Miguel County, New Mexico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 28
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in San Miguel County, New Mexico totaled $94,655 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Sanchez Ranch Inc | Solano, NM 87746 | $11,290 |
2 | Virginia Franko | Trementina, NM 88439 | $10,951 |
3 | Sacramento Baca Jr | Sabinoso, NM 87744 | $9,450 |
4 | Jason Baca | Roy, NM 87743 | $7,425 |
5 | Carlos A Martinez | Solano, NM 87746 | $5,000 |
6 | Harmon Reynolds | Conchas Dam, NM 88416 | $4,928 |
7 | Abel N Lucero | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $4,080 |
8 | Larry Encinias | Villanueva, NM 87583 | $3,792 |
9 | Ruben Lucero | Espanola, NM 87533 | $3,672 |
10 | Henry Sena | Ribera, NM 87560 | $3,285 |
11 | Cipriano Baca | Anton Chico, NM 87711 | $2,831 |
12 | Cecilio Lujan | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $2,822 |
13 | Eugene Trujillo | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $2,796 |
14 | Connie M Vigil | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $2,673 |
15 | Gilbert Ortiz | Villanueva, NM 87583 | $2,571 |
16 | Jose Sandoval | Ribera, NM 87560 | $2,298 |
17 | Holt Brothers | Gruver, TX 79040 | $2,250 |
18 | Raymond Villanueva | Villanueva, NM 87583 | $1,918 |
19 | George Vigil | Los Alamos, NM 87544 | $1,725 |
20 | Candido Baca | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $1,672 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>