Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in San Miguel County, New Mexico, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 184
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in San Miguel County, New Mexico totaled $1,600,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Antonio Esquibel | Roy, NM 87743 | $11,285 |
42 | Seth D Brockman | Conchas Dam, NM 88416 | $11,186 |
43 | Thomas Boylan | Espanola, NM 87532 | $10,608 |
44 | , | $10,310 | |
45 | Benerito Gallegos | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $10,307 |
46 | , | $10,249 | |
47 | Napoleon F Quintana | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $10,034 |
48 | Abel N Lucero | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $10,007 |
49 | Sacramento Baca Jr | Sabinoso, NM 87744 | $9,691 |
50 | Elena Gutierrez | Solano, NM 87746 | $9,281 |
51 | Leroy Lucero | Villanueva, NM 87583 | $9,201 |
52 | Levy Edward Achilles Lujan | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $9,152 |
53 | Jimmy Rodriquez | Santa Fe, NM 87507 | $9,113 |
54 | Robert L Anderson | Ribera, NM 87560 | $8,591 |
55 | Darlene R Tapia | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $8,536 |
56 | Gilbert Sena | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $8,058 |
57 | Ruben Romero | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $8,048 |
58 | James Gallegos | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $7,567 |
59 | Michael L Gregory | Solano, NM 87746 | $7,496 |
60 | , | $7,382 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”