Total Commodity Programs in San Miguel County, New Mexico, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 186
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in San Miguel County, New Mexico totaled $481,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Matilda Gallegos | Villanueva, NM 87583 | $2,127 |
42 | Joshua James Casias | Albuquerque, NM 87120 | $2,090 |
43 | James Floyd Fernandaz | Ocate, NM 87734 | $1,994 |
44 | Leroy P Padilla | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $1,908 |
45 | Floyd L Gonzales | Albuquerque, NM 87111 | $1,883 |
46 | Jason Baca | Roy, NM 87743 | $1,836 |
47 | Ernest Sandoval | Sapello, NM 87745 | $1,814 |
48 | Gene Romero | Pecos, NM 87552 | $1,656 |
49 | Gonzales Cattle LLC | Pecos, NM 87552 | $1,638 |
50 | Jose Silviano Gomez | Rociada, NM 87742 | $1,592 |
51 | Robert S Gutierrez | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $1,591 |
52 | Jessie Esquibel | Solano, NM 87746 | $1,512 |
53 | Thomas Boylan | Espanola, NM 87532 | $1,467 |
54 | Archie A Allemand | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $1,465 |
55 | Monica R Ashe | Buena Vista, NM 87712 | $1,380 |
56 | Levy Edward Lujan | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $1,366 |
57 | Jospeh Gonzales | Montrose, CO 81401 | $1,330 |
58 | Thomas A Ortiz | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $1,328 |
59 | Lourdes V Encinias | Ribera, NM 87560 | $1,316 |
60 | Jose I Gonzales | Anton Chico, NM 87711 | $1,295 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”