Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in San Miguel County, New Mexico, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 184
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in San Miguel County, New Mexico totaled $1,600,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Thomas A Ortiz | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $7,186 |
62 | Karlene R Gonzales | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $7,148 |
63 | Tobias Medina | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $7,086 |
64 | Juan N Quintana Land & Cattle Company | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $7,043 |
65 | Amalia Varela-padilla | Rowe, NM 87562 | $6,974 |
66 | Floyd L Gonzales | Albuquerque, NM 87111 | $6,911 |
67 | Marvin F Mascarenas | Sapello, NM 87745 | $6,716 |
68 | Lourdes V Encinias | Ribera, NM 87560 | $6,434 |
69 | Leroy P Padilla | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $6,346 |
70 | Toribio Martinez | Sapello, NM 87745 | $6,160 |
71 | Fred T Gonzales | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $5,866 |
72 | Noble Brooks Read | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $5,850 |
73 | Gonzales Cattle LLC | Pecos, NM 87552 | $5,745 |
74 | Mary Laraine Romero | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $5,684 |
75 | Shirley Marrujo | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $5,654 |
76 | Salomon Telesfor Archuleta | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $5,646 |
77 | Larry A Lucero | Espanola, NM 87533 | $5,624 |
78 | Dora M Romero | Cleveland, NM 87715 | $5,447 |
79 | , | $5,187 | |
80 | Andres Aragon | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $5,134 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”