Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in San Miguel County, New Mexico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 381
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in San Miguel County, New Mexico totaled $1,921,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Bernardo Gonzales | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $2,231 |
162 | Glenna Morison | Garita, NM 88421 | $2,229 |
163 | Ramon O Vigil | Pecos, NM 87552 | $2,228 |
164 | Jose M Quintana | Garita, NM 88421 | $2,227 |
165 | Carlos L Martinez | Sapello, NM 87745 | $2,210 |
166 | Joe Aragon | Albuquerque, NM 87111 | $2,201 |
167 | Fred T Gonzales | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $2,152 |
168 | Sher Farms | Ribera, NM 87560 | $2,105 |
169 | Frank J Lucero Sr | Albuquerque, NM 87110 | $2,102 |
170 | Joe C Lopez | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $2,067 |
171 | Max J Salazar | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $2,031 |
172 | Jimmy A Garcia | Roy, NM 87743 | $2,010 |
173 | Leopoldo Duran | Rociada, NM 87742 | $2,006 |
174 | Joseph E Costello | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $1,995 |
175 | Reese Partnership | Buena Vista, NM 87712 | $1,979 |
176 | Matilda Gallegos | Villanueva, NM 87583 | $1,961 |
177 | Pauline Gallegos | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $1,944 |
178 | Larry Sena | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $1,858 |
179 | Gilberto Tenorio | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $1,820 |
180 | Edward Sena | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $1,791 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”