CCC Organic Programs in New York, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 297
Recipients of CCC Organic Programs from farms in New York totaled $197,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | CCC Organic Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Leo Hafelin | North Brookfield, NY 13418 | $2,600 |
2 | Dutch Lane Farm | Sherburne, NY 13460 | $2,500 |
3 | Dale Windecker | Frankfort, NY 13340 | $2,000 |
4 | Jason H Schell | Philadelphia, NY 13673 | $2,000 |
5 | Bevan I Jones | Sherburne, NY 13460 | $2,000 |
6 | Joel P Bates | West Edmeston, NY 13485 | $1,903 |
7 | Kevin S Murphy | Hubbardsville, NY 13355 | $1,675 |
8 | Gayle A Thorpe | East Aurora, NY 14052 | $1,500 |
9 | Christopher P Spaulding | Crown Point, NY 12928 | $1,500 |
10 | Eden Valley Organics LLC | Eden, NY 14057 | $1,500 |
11 | Timothy James Christiansen | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $1,500 |
12 | Hoel-way Farm | Cincinnatus, NY 13040 | $1,425 |
13 | William K Slate | Mannsville, NY 13661 | $1,350 |
14 | Eric D Peck | Mc Graw, NY 13101 | $1,345 |
15 | Timothy Matis | Saint Johnsville, NY 13452 | $1,325 |
16 | Douglas & Dean Brown | South Plymouth, NY 13844 | $1,313 |
17 | Philia Farm | Johnstown, NY 12095 | $1,250 |
18 | Cobblestone Valley Enterprises LLC | Preble, NY 13141 | $1,125 |
19 | Adam N Hainer | Westport, NY 12993 | $1,113 |
20 | Donald Macintosh | Norwich, NY 13815 | $1,073 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>