Emergency Conservation Program in New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,114
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in New York totaled $16,236,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Leonard Debuck | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $34,412 |
62 | Adirondack Farms LLC | Peru, NY 12972 | $34,331 |
63 | William J Stephenson | Theresa, NY 13691 | $33,834 |
64 | Gregory Yurchuk Jr | Florida, NY 10921 | $33,773 |
65 | Gertrude Wagner | Owego, NY 13827 | $33,411 |
66 | Engelbert Farms Organic LLC | Nichols, NY 13812 | $32,980 |
67 | Walt's Dairy, LLC | Copake, NY 12516 | $32,839 |
68 | Wagner Farm Properties LLC | Poestenkill, NY 12140 | $32,531 |
69 | Dominick Favata & Sons | Rome, NY 13440 | $32,448 |
70 | Floyd J Mikulski | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $32,250 |
71 | Arthur Diekow | Killawog, NY 13794 | $32,183 |
72 | Howard Cornwell | Central Bridge, NY 12035 | $31,004 |
73 | Wayne Decoste Dba | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $30,923 |
74 | Ridgeview Farms Inc | Champlain, NY 12919 | $30,869 |
75 | Sorbello Farms | Fulton, NY 13069 | $30,770 |
76 | Robert Atwood | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $30,575 |
77 | Richard Atwood | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $30,574 |
78 | Raymond Myruski | Goshen, NY 10924 | $30,121 |
79 | F A Guernsey & Co Inc | Schoharie, NY 12157 | $29,947 |
80 | Elaine Hesseltine | Malone, NY 12953 | $29,493 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”