Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 170
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in New York totaled $3,880,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Ashland Farm LLC | Aurora, NY 13026 | $8,474 |
82 | Alan John Panek | Albion, NY 14411 | $8,094 |
83 | Thomas Woznica | Cicero, NY 13039 | $7,992 |
84 | Carley Farms LLC | Pompey, NY 13138 | $7,954 |
85 | Joanna Johnson | West Edmeston, NY 13485 | $7,927 |
86 | Bruce L Card | Skaneateles, NY 13152 | $7,909 |
87 | Harold E Schader | Memphis, NY 13112 | $7,715 |
88 | Richard Schader | Memphis, NY 13112 | $7,715 |
89 | Charles F Luchsinger And Susan B Luchsinger | Syracuse, NY 13215 | $7,614 |
90 | Annable Farms | Marcellus, NY 13108 | $7,106 |
91 | Palladino Farms | Jamesville, NY 13078 | $6,387 |
92 | Thomas J Begley | Cato, NY 13033 | $6,092 |
93 | John Reimels & Son Inc | Wayland, NY 14572 | $6,039 |
94 | Woodlawn Dairy Farm LLC | Richfield Springs, NY 13439 | $5,882 |
95 | Timothy M Cantwell | Richfield Springs, NY 13439 | $5,822 |
96 | Thomas L Youngs | Schoharie, NY 12157 | $5,814 |
97 | Joseph Green | Bloomfield, NY 14469 | $5,514 |
98 | Richard J Stellingwerf Sr | Fulton, NY 13069 | $5,255 |
99 | Lee F Deruyter | Phelps, NY 14532 | $5,078 |
100 | Lester Price | Whitney Point, NY 13862 | $4,982 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”