Conservation Reserve Program in New York, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 857
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in New York totaled $1,732,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Peter C. Fletcher | Canandaigua, NY 14424 | $2,753 |
162 | W Carver Farrell | Bovina Center, NY 13740 | $2,742 |
163 | William J Mahoney | Birmingham, AL 35209 | $2,718 |
164 | Emerald Isle LLC Michael J Merritt Sole Mbr | Hartsdale, NY 10530 | $2,715 |
165 | Rickey C Timothy | Dalton, NY 14836 | $2,707 |
166 | Vanwaldick Acres LLC | Rodman, NY 13682 | $2,697 |
167 | Timothy Johnson | Halcott Center, NY 12430 | $2,669 |
168 | Ringwood Farms LLC | Cooperstown, NY 13326 | $2,648 |
169 | Whittaker Farms LLC | Whitney Point, NY 13862 | $2,646 |
170 | Edward S Slicer | Jefferson, NY 12093 | $2,644 |
171 | Charles E Dominesey | Varysburg, NY 14167 | $2,589 |
172 | Park Family Farm LLC | Truxton, NY 13158 | $2,581 |
173 | Meghan Moody Potter | Hamden, NY 13782 | $2,578 |
174 | George Duvall | Bloomfield, NY 14469 | $2,572 |
175 | John F Thomas | Corbettsville, NY 13749 | $2,568 |
176 | Roland R Robinson | Marathon, NY 13803 | $2,523 |
177 | Michael W Trapp | Gouverneur, NY 13642 | $2,520 |
178 | Philip Rea | Newark Valley, NY 13811 | $2,512 |
179 | Breed Acres LLC | Fairport, NY 14450 | $2,484 |
180 | Stanley Duncan | Cortland, NY 13045 | $2,477 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”