CCC Organic Programs in New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 571
Recipients of CCC Organic Programs from farms in New York totaled $971,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | CCC Organic Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Todd K Snyder | Turin, NY 13473 | $1,903 |
182 | Peter R Swendsen | Akron, NY 14001 | $1,892 |
183 | Alpine Made LLC | South Wales, NY 14139 | $1,888 |
184 | Ulinger's Maple Farm LLC | East Otto, NY 14729 | $1,875 |
185 | Timothy Matis | Saint Johnsville, NY 13452 | $1,850 |
186 | Keith Campbell Dba Antique Valley | Greene, NY 13778 | $1,839 |
187 | Timothy Smith | Ellenburg Depot, NY 12935 | $1,838 |
188 | Ronald E Luchsinger | Lafayette, NY 13084 | $1,831 |
189 | George Schweigart | Woodhull, NY 14898 | $1,813 |
190 | J Edward Tidd | Skaneateles, NY 13152 | $1,804 |
191 | Farron Benjamin | West Edmeston, NY 13485 | $1,800 |
192 | , | $1,800 | |
193 | Paul D Hargett | Locke, NY 13092 | $1,796 |
194 | Marc A Bliss | Freedom, NY 14065 | $1,781 |
195 | Clay Hill Farm, LLC | Central Bridge, NY 12035 | $1,781 |
196 | Paul H Walrod | Georgetown, NY 13072 | $1,775 |
197 | Maple Lane Farm LLC | Antwerp, NY 13608 | $1,750 |
198 | Tangleroot Farm | Essex, NY 12936 | $1,750 |
199 | Bear's Fruit, LLC | Brooklyn, NY 11232 | $1,750 |
200 | Jem Maple Farm LLC | Chatham, NY 12037 | $1,750 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”