Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in New York, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 789
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in New York totaled $2,171,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Park Family Farm LLC | Truxton, NY 13158 | $19,229 |
22 | Saratoga Sod Farm Inc | Stillwater, NY 12170 | $18,887 |
23 | Harrigan Brothers Dairy Farm | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $18,508 |
24 | Hidden View Farm LLC | Champlain, NY 12919 | $18,037 |
25 | William K Ashline | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $17,702 |
26 | Partners With The Land | Byron, NY 14422 | $16,942 |
27 | Rusty Creek Farm LLC | Chazy, NY 12921 | $16,784 |
28 | Leduc's Green Acre Farm LLC | Champlain, NY 12919 | $16,753 |
29 | Douglas Jones | Seneca Falls, NY 13148 | $16,716 |
30 | Robert L Crowe | Canajoharie, NY 13317 | $15,983 |
31 | Austic Farm Partners | Interlaken, NY 14847 | $15,731 |
32 | David J Borrelli Farms | Hilton, NY 14468 | $14,722 |
33 | North Ridge Farms | Hilton, NY 14468 | $14,211 |
34 | David R Wood As Eildon Tweed Farm LLC | Amsterdam, NY 12010 | $13,729 |
35 | Oakfield Alabama Farms | Oakfield, NY 14125 | $13,617 |
36 | Denn-e-dale Farms LLC | Cato, NY 13033 | $13,327 |
37 | Slobe Farms LLC | Red Creek, NY 13143 | $12,823 |
38 | Remillard Farms LLC | Peru, NY 12972 | $12,651 |
39 | Mabel Rasmussen | Waterloo, NY 13165 | $12,586 |
40 | Dimock Farms LLC | Peru, NY 12972 | $12,561 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”