Counter Cyclical Program in Cattaraugus County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 403
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Cattaraugus County, New York totaled $1,212,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Carl F Frenz | Salamanca, NY 14779 | $10,173 |
22 | Car-bu Farm LLC | Freedom, NY 14065 | $9,877 |
23 | Charles King Jr | Chaffee, NY 14030 | $8,888 |
24 | George Farm Carl & Barb | Delevan, NY 14042 | $8,828 |
25 | Robert R Orr | Silver Creek, NY 14136 | $8,521 |
26 | Valent Stock And Dairy Farm LLC | Salamanca, NY 14779 | $8,471 |
27 | Duane D Tingue Jr | Delevan, NY 14042 | $8,368 |
28 | Donald Sinn | Cattaraugus, NY 14719 | $8,066 |
29 | David Habermehl | Lawtons, NY 14091 | $7,415 |
30 | Daniel J Andera | Ellicottville, NY 14731 | $7,397 |
31 | Francis C Andera | Great Valley, NY 14741 | $7,325 |
32 | Michael L Kent | Ellicottville, NY 14731 | $6,996 |
33 | Jeffrey Schulz | Kennedy, NY 14747 | $6,990 |
34 | James Brown | Franklinville, NY 14737 | $6,449 |
35 | Ronald Dechow | Little Valley, NY 14755 | $6,379 |
36 | Thomas Degenfelder | Cattaraugus, NY 14719 | $6,305 |
37 | Dennis Beaver | Randolph, NY 14772 | $6,256 |
38 | Phillip Pagett | South Dayton, NY 14138 | $6,201 |
39 | Ra De Ha Farm Dba | Great Valley, NY 14741 | $6,175 |
40 | James W Hill | Cattaraugus, NY 14719 | $6,137 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”