Farm Subsidy information
Cattaraugus County, New York
Total Subsidies in Cattaraugus County, New York, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 241
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cattaraugus County, New York totaled $4,659,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | David Forster | East Otto, NY 14729 | $29,286 |
42 | Wayne Horton | Randolph, NY 14772 | $28,301 |
43 | David Dechow | Cattaraugus, NY 14719 | $27,790 |
44 | Newland Farm | Freedom, NY 14065 | $25,342 |
45 | Robert Studley Jr | Gowanda, NY 14070 | $24,168 |
46 | David Baker | Cattaraugus, NY 14719 | $24,106 |
47 | Kenneth Dechow | Randolph, NY 14772 | $23,300 |
48 | Brian Mcclory | Franklinville, NY 14737 | $23,241 |
49 | Neal Farm LLC | Otto, NY 14766 | $22,776 |
50 | Martdale Farms LLC | Olean, NY 14760 | $22,195 |
51 | Josh Bailey LLC | Cattaraugus, NY 14719 | $21,423 |
52 | Brian J Smith | Machias, NY 14101 | $21,418 |
53 | James Karn | Cuba, NY 14727 | $20,852 |
54 | Wright Farms Inc | Franklinville, NY 14737 | $18,103 |
55 | Thomas W Andrews Dba Pine Hill Cattle Co | Randolph, NY 14772 | $17,245 |
56 | Childs Blueberries And Raspberries | Hinsdale, NY 14743 | $17,205 |
57 | Miles David Perry | Franklinville, NY 14737 | $16,719 |
58 | Andrew Kasprzak | Little Valley, NY 14755 | $16,607 |
59 | Daren E Waterman | Conewango Valley, NY 14726 | $16,219 |
60 | Mark Hansen | Machias, NY 14101 | $16,157 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”