Total Commodity Programs in Cattaraugus County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,141
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Cattaraugus County, New York totaled $51,665,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Douglas Nichols | Farmersville Station, NY 14060 | $126,976 |
82 | Wayne Horton | Randolph, NY 14772 | $126,539 |
83 | Diamond Land And Cattle LLC | South Dayton, NY 14138 | $126,036 |
84 | Henry C Forster | East Otto, NY 14729 | $123,607 |
85 | Jeffrey Schulz | Kennedy, NY 14747 | $123,601 |
86 | David Habermehl | Lawtons, NY 14091 | $122,509 |
87 | Daniel Boberg | Freedom, NY 14065 | $122,452 |
88 | Jay Brooks Jr | Machias, NY 14101 | $122,390 |
89 | Charles King Jr | Chaffee, NY 14030 | $121,764 |
90 | Shagbark-p Rolling View Acres | Randolph, NY 14772 | $119,902 |
91 | Adelia H Ritter | Conewango Valley, NY 14726 | $119,418 |
92 | Josh Bailey LLC | Cattaraugus, NY 14719 | $119,090 |
93 | Ra De Ha Farm Dba | Great Valley, NY 14741 | $118,942 |
94 | Kaluzny Farms | Franklinville, NY 14737 | $115,549 |
95 | Kay C Kent | Great Valley, NY 14741 | $115,516 |
96 | Bernard Perry | Machias, NY 14101 | $111,381 |
97 | Milliman Farms Inc | Cattaraugus, NY 14719 | $111,056 |
98 | Alan Boberg | Delevan, NY 14042 | $111,001 |
99 | Thomas W Andrews Dba Pine Hill Cattle Co | Randolph, NY 14772 | $110,366 |
100 | Robert Lockwood | Randolph, NY 14772 | $109,658 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”