Deficiency Payment in Cattaraugus County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 348
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Cattaraugus County, New York totaled $502,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Leonard A Kaluzny | Franklinville, NY 14737 | $1,571 |
102 | Darlene Smith | Great Valley, NY 14741 | $1,566 |
103 | Russell Gross | Cuba, NY 14727 | $1,554 |
104 | Duane Leonard Estate | Freedom, NY 14065 | $1,538 |
105 | Michael C Smith | South Dayton, NY 14138 | $1,512 |
106 | Edgar Ploetz | West Valley, NY 14171 | $1,508 |
107 | Donald Newland | Freedom, NY 14065 | $1,483 |
108 | Edward Crowley | Great Valley, NY 14741 | $1,465 |
109 | J & T Finch Farm | Freedom, NY 14065 | $1,463 |
110 | Stanley Rogacki | Franklinville, NY 14737 | $1,445 |
111 | Herbert Clark | Cattaraugus, NY 14719 | $1,438 |
112 | Wayne H Kent | Little Valley, NY 14755 | $1,429 |
113 | Ruby Shenk | Machias, NY 14101 | $1,422 |
114 | Jack Pollard | Delevan, NY 14042 | $1,419 |
115 | Joseph Zynczak Estate | West Valley, NY 14171 | $1,410 |
116 | Michael W Chinchen | East Otto, NY 14729 | $1,393 |
117 | William E Campbell | Little Valley, NY 14755 | $1,393 |
118 | Alfred Hill | Holly Hill, FL 32117 | $1,391 |
119 | Frederick Love | Franklinville, NY 14737 | $1,390 |
120 | Robert Prentice | Great Valley, NY 14741 | $1,389 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”