Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Cattaraugus County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 274
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Cattaraugus County, New York totaled $2,947,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Brian Volpe | Randolph, NY 14772 | $3,486 |
142 | James J Snyder Jr | Cuba, NY 14727 | $3,421 |
143 | Martha Dewey | Perrysburg, NY 14129 | $3,379 |
144 | Eric Visnesky | Otto, NY 14766 | $3,368 |
145 | Kirk Rowland | Great Valley, NY 14741 | $3,360 |
146 | Ralph Howard | Franklinville, NY 14737 | $3,322 |
147 | James Karn | Cuba, NY 14727 | $3,216 |
148 | Kenneth E Smith | Salamanca, NY 14779 | $3,185 |
149 | David D Reed | Cattaraugus, NY 14719 | $3,174 |
150 | Charles J Weber | Perrysburg, NY 14129 | $3,146 |
151 | David Beardi | Gowanda, NY 14070 | $3,093 |
152 | Pumpkinville LLC | Great Valley, NY 14741 | $3,092 |
153 | William C Althans Jr | Ellicottville, NY 14731 | $3,020 |
154 | Eden Valley Organics LLC | Eden, NY 14057 | $3,001 |
155 | James A Frentz | Cattaraugus, NY 14719 | $2,999 |
156 | Bernard Perry | Machias, NY 14101 | $2,961 |
157 | Hitchcock Farms LLC | Delevan, NY 14042 | $2,951 |
158 | Daniel Boberg | Freedom, NY 14065 | $2,947 |
159 | James Gangloff | Cheektowaga, NY 14225 | $2,843 |
160 | Hess Farm LLC | West Valley, NY 14171 | $2,832 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”