Direct Payment Program in Cattaraugus County, New York, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 627
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Cattaraugus County, New York totaled $5,563,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | David Cobo | West Valley, NY 14171 | $43,936 |
22 | Palmer Farms | Holland, NY 14080 | $42,986 |
23 | Colonial Hill Farms | South Dayton, NY 14138 | $42,614 |
24 | Valent Stock And Dairy Farm LLC | Salamanca, NY 14779 | $41,084 |
25 | Donald Sinn | Cattaraugus, NY 14719 | $39,023 |
26 | Everett Mosher Sr | South Dayton, NY 14138 | $35,488 |
27 | Wilean Farms Dba - Wilfred Jones | East Otto, NY 14729 | $35,296 |
28 | Robert R Orr | Silver Creek, NY 14136 | $34,671 |
29 | Jeffrey Schulz | Kennedy, NY 14747 | $34,667 |
30 | Daniel J Andera | Ellicottville, NY 14731 | $34,539 |
31 | Dana Rublee | Salamanca, NY 14779 | $32,678 |
32 | Douglas Nichols | Farmersville Station, NY 14060 | $31,495 |
33 | Thomas Degenfelder | Cattaraugus, NY 14719 | $31,243 |
34 | Charles King Jr | Chaffee, NY 14030 | $30,941 |
35 | Phillip Pagett | South Dayton, NY 14138 | $29,973 |
36 | Dye Farms Dba Timothy Dye | South Dayton, NY 14138 | $29,881 |
37 | Milford Drake | Arcade, NY 14009 | $29,743 |
38 | Diamond Land And Cattle LLC | South Dayton, NY 14138 | $28,550 |
39 | Michael L Kent | Ellicottville, NY 14731 | $27,795 |
40 | Jay Brooks Jr | Machias, NY 14101 | $27,534 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”