Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Chautauqua County, New York, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 104
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Chautauqua County, New York totaled $304,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mitchell Farnham | Stockton, NY 14784 | $291 |
42 | Dawson P Bogert | Clymer, NY 14724 | $287 |
43 | Ball Hill Farms Inc | Forestville, NY 14062 | $263 |
44 | Perry Farm | South Dayton, NY 14138 | $247 |
45 | Timothy Miller | Falconer, NY 14733 | $233 |
46 | Odell Farms Partnership | Panama, NY 14767 | $230 |
47 | Michael Macey | Falconer, NY 14733 | $225 |
48 | Jason Nagel | Panama, NY 14767 | $215 |
49 | Good Living Acres LLC | Falconer, NY 14733 | $211 |
50 | Dennis A Carlberg | Frewsburg, NY 14738 | $210 |
51 | Eric T Vanstrom | Kennedy, NY 14747 | $181 |
52 | Emanuel Miller | Sherman, NY 14781 | $169 |
53 | Jnj Farms LLC | Clymer, NY 14724 | $155 |
54 | Ronald D Reed II | Sherman, NY 14781 | $140 |
55 | Virginia E Carlberg | Jamestown, NY 14701 | $128 |
56 | Harvey M Mast | Sherman, NY 14781 | $119 |
57 | Samuel Starceski | Sherman, NY 14781 | $114 |
58 | R D Crowell Farms, LLC | South Dayton, NY 14138 | $105 |
59 | Dunnewold Farms LLC | Clymer, NY 14724 | $102 |
60 | Kurt White | Clymer, NY 14724 | $102 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”