Farm Subsidy information
Chautauqua County, New York
Total Subsidies in Chautauqua County, New York, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 196
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chautauqua County, New York totaled $6,922,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jeremy Mcchesney | Sinclairville, NY 14782 | $19,684 |
62 | Charles J Kopta Jr | Panama, NY 14767 | $19,674 |
63 | Dennis Emke | Cherry Creek, NY 14723 | $19,254 |
64 | Eric T Vanstrom | Kennedy, NY 14747 | $18,735 |
65 | Brian Holthouse | Clymer, NY 14724 | $18,545 |
66 | Rice Farm | Kennedy, NY 14747 | $18,410 |
67 | Michael J Wiggers | Panama, NY 14767 | $18,114 |
68 | Todd Smith | Panama, NY 14767 | $17,301 |
69 | Deborah T Kwasniewski | Portland, NY 14769 | $16,059 |
70 | Lester A Byler | Clymer, NY 14724 | $15,952 |
71 | Falcone Farms Inc | Forestville, NY 14062 | $15,467 |
72 | Emanuel Miller | Sherman, NY 14781 | $14,641 |
73 | Corey D Rhodes | Clymer, NY 14724 | $13,871 |
74 | Grape Solutions Inc | Fredonia, NY 14063 | $13,823 |
75 | Hanover Ag And Custom Services LLC | Silver Creek, NY 14136 | $13,681 |
76 | Jesse Griswold | Clymer, NY 14724 | $12,999 |
77 | Chester A Byler | Sherman, NY 14781 | $12,863 |
78 | Stewart K Ward | South Dayton, NY 14138 | $12,512 |
79 | John T Cline | Kennedy, NY 14747 | $12,499 |
80 | Robert F Thompson | Silver Creek, NY 14136 | $11,532 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”