Counter Cyclical Program in Chautauqua County, New York, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 177
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Chautauqua County, New York totaled $1,013,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Wolcott Dairy LLC | Sinclairville, NY 14782 | $10,567 |
22 | Ormond Farm | Kennedy, NY 14747 | $9,892 |
23 | Dunnewold Farms LLC | Clymer, NY 14724 | $9,703 |
24 | Arlaine Farms | Sinclairville, NY 14782 | $9,676 |
25 | Fairdawn Farms Inc | Forestville, NY 14062 | $9,165 |
26 | Leonard Szydlo | Fredonia, NY 14063 | $8,903 |
27 | John C Swanson | Sinclairville, NY 14782 | $8,844 |
28 | Gier Farms Inc | Cherry Creek, NY 14723 | $8,225 |
29 | Daniel Troutman | South Dayton, NY 14138 | $7,983 |
30 | Perry Dewey Jr | Clymer, NY 14724 | $7,804 |
31 | Jack Jones | Frewsburg, NY 14738 | $7,660 |
32 | Merle Elderkin | Sinclairville, NY 14782 | $7,444 |
33 | Butcher Crest Farm | South Dayton, NY 14138 | $7,083 |
34 | Stephen Or Sally Mcchesney | Sinclairville, NY 14782 | $7,063 |
35 | Howard Ivett | South Dayton, NY 14138 | $6,985 |
36 | Michael Rater | Sherman, NY 14781 | $6,869 |
37 | John C Or R James Cheney | Bemus Point, NY 14712 | $6,848 |
38 | Albert Van Dette Jr | Silver Creek, NY 14136 | $6,642 |
39 | Ben Whitney | Clymer, NY 14724 | $6,589 |
40 | Dwayne R Emke | Forestville, NY 14062 | $6,526 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”