Counter Cyclical Program in Chemung County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 110
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Chemung County, New York totaled $322,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | R J Victor | Elmira, NY 14901 | $686 |
62 | Rodney M Roe | Horseheads, NY 14845 | $659 |
63 | Charles Stickler | Pine City, NY 14871 | $611 |
64 | Theron Strouse Jr | Pine City, NY 14871 | $589 |
65 | Leon P Kraszewski Jr | Corning, NY 14830 | $586 |
66 | John Watts Estate | Pine City, NY 14871 | $528 |
67 | Earl P Robinson | Lowman, NY 14861 | $521 |
68 | John E Benjamin | Horseheads, NY 14845 | $510 |
69 | Ivan Kiser | Horseheads, NY 14845 | $503 |
70 | Fred K Lewis | Horseheads, NY 14845 | $479 |
71 | Aloise M Benedict | Cayuta, NY 14824 | $477 |
72 | Raymond Benjamin | Cayuta, NY 14824 | $472 |
73 | Floyd H Bennett | Horseheads, NY 14845 | $462 |
74 | Jerry Tillotson | Lowman, NY 14861 | $456 |
75 | Alden H Smith | Beaver Dams, NY 14812 | $444 |
76 | Wayne A Campbell | Horseheads, NY 14845 | $442 |
77 | Fern O Rhode Estate | Lowman, NY 14861 | $419 |
78 | Richard B Kimball | Pine City, NY 14871 | $408 |
79 | George L Warner | Van Etten, NY 14889 | $399 |
80 | Gene Evans | Lockwood, NY 14859 | $374 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”