Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Chenango County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 60
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Chenango County, New York totaled $163,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Albert F Denz | Oxford, NY 13830 | $2,217 |
22 | Irwin Farms | Earlville, NY 13332 | $2,198 |
23 | Robert C Fleming | Guilford, NY 13780 | $2,062 |
24 | Donnivale Farms | Sherburne, NY 13460 | $1,999 |
25 | Richard F Posson | No Norwich, NY 13814 | $1,945 |
26 | Marshman Farms LLC | Oxford, NY 13830 | $1,906 |
27 | John E Howard | Sherburne, NY 13460 | $1,888 |
28 | Kenneth F Winifred C Baldwin Rich | De Ruyter, NY 13052 | $1,838 |
29 | Adam Tafel | Laurens, NY 13796 | $1,600 |
30 | Kenneth G Dibbell | South New Berlin, NY 13843 | $1,594 |
31 | Charles Burk Jr | Norwich, NY 13815 | $1,391 |
32 | Wilma P Clarke | South New Berlin, NY 13843 | $1,200 |
33 | Wayne Smith | South Otselic, NY 13155 | $1,144 |
34 | Dorinne M Reiley | Avon, CT 06001 | $1,040 |
35 | Helen Peck | North Bergen, NJ 07047 | $960 |
36 | Galvin W Huston | Harpursville, NY 13787 | $956 |
37 | George Dejager | Smithville Flats, NY 13841 | $849 |
38 | Michael Bouros | Lake Ronkonkoma, NY 11779 | $800 |
39 | Herman & Barbara Schneider | North Norwich, NY 13814 | $800 |
40 | Kenneth F Lewis | Haughton, LA 71037 | $800 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”