Farm Subsidy information
Chenango County, New York
Total Subsidies in Chenango County, New York, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 249
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chenango County, New York totaled $6,855,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cobar Dairy LLC | Mount Upton, NY 13809 | $467,299 |
| 2 | Indian Camp Farm LLC | Earlville, NY 13332 | $408,500 |
| 3 | Johnson Farms LLC | New Berlin, NY 13411 | $392,479 |
| 4 | Marshman Farms LLC | Oxford, NY 13830 | $344,914 |
| 5 | Norwich Meadows Farm LLC | Norwich, NY 13815 | $295,055 |
| 6 | Postma Brothers LLC | New Berlin, NY 13411 | $224,229 |
| 7 | Joseph Warren | Greene, NY 13778 | $197,921 |
| 8 | Happy Valley Farm | Sherburne, NY 13460 | $182,422 |
| 9 | Roger Agren | Georgetown, NY 13072 | $168,103 |
| 10 | Balsam View Dairy Farm LLC | Mc Donough, NY 13801 | $152,031 |
| 11 | Van Althuis Dairy LLC | Sherburne, NY 13460 | $142,215 |
| 12 | Kutiks Honey Farm LLC | Oxford, NY 13830 | $104,357 |
| 13 | Davis Round 2 Farm | Smyrna, NY 13464 | $104,098 |
| 14 | Robert Frank | Oxford, NY 13830 | $102,238 |
| 15 | Dean Mikalunas | Sherburne, NY 13460 | $89,856 |
| 16 | Ingerto Farm LLC | Smyrna, NY 13464 | $88,935 |
| 17 | Cheshire Valley Farms LLC | Oxford, NY 13830 | $81,922 |
| 18 | Mary Klecha Conroe | Greene, NY 13778 | $78,556 |
| 19 | Lathrops Milk Ranch LLC | Sherburne, NY 13460 | $77,381 |
| 20 | Kip Law | Sherburne, NY 13460 | $73,010 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf