Farm Subsidy information
Chenango County, New York
Total Subsidies in Chenango County, New York, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 198
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chenango County, New York totaled $4,300,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Marshman Farms LLC | Oxford, NY 13830 | $147,716 |
2 | Cobar Dairy LLC | Mount Upton, NY 13809 | $141,608 |
3 | Indian Camp Farm LLC | Earlville, NY 13332 | $132,845 |
4 | Johnson Farms LLC | New Berlin, NY 13411 | $130,359 |
5 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $127,956 |
6 | Postma Brothers LLC | New Berlin, NY 13411 | $122,762 |
7 | Hanehan Family Dairy - LLC | Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 | $120,508 |
8 | Joseph Warren | Greene, NY 13778 | $118,905 |
9 | Van Althuis Dairy LLC | Sherburne, NY 13460 | $118,352 |
10 | Balsam View Dairy Farm LLC | Mc Donough, NY 13801 | $115,754 |
11 | Happy Valley Farm | Sherburne, NY 13460 | $112,478 |
12 | Roger Agren | Georgetown, NY 13072 | $97,480 |
13 | Robert Frank | Oxford, NY 13830 | $87,910 |
14 | Ingerto Farm LLC | Smyrna, NY 13464 | $71,218 |
15 | Davis Round 2 Farm | Smyrna, NY 13464 | $70,020 |
16 | Dean Mikalunas | Sherburne, NY 13460 | $66,926 |
17 | Mary Klecha Conroe | Greene, NY 13778 | $66,334 |
18 | Stephen L Dygert Dba Fantasy Fruit Farm | Afton, NY 13730 | $55,853 |
19 | John Kemmeren | Bainbridge, NY 13733 | $55,027 |
20 | Mark D Ives | Bainbridge, NY 13733 | $54,342 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>