Farm Subsidy information
Clinton County, New York
Total Subsidies in Clinton County, New York, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 91
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clinton County, New York totaled $2,645,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Sullivan Orchards Inc | Peru, NY 12972 | $448,486 |
2 | Giroux's Poultry Farm Inc | Chazy, NY 12921 | $242,954 |
3 | Rusty Creek Farm LLC | Chazy, NY 12921 | $53,912 |
4 | Bruce Sullivan | Morrisonville, NY 12962 | $53,108 |
5 | Keith R Brior | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $50,250 |
6 | Gonyo Brothers, LLC | Champlain, NY 12919 | $11,866 |
7 | Christopher Sunderland | Ellenburg Depot, NY 12935 | $11,795 |
8 | Remillard Farms LLC | Peru, NY 12972 | $10,452 |
9 | Leduc's Green Acre Farm LLC | Champlain, NY 12919 | $10,452 |
10 | Tony Robert Lamberton | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $10,452 |
11 | The William H Miner Agricultural Research Institut | Chazy, NY 12921 | $10,452 |
12 | Three L Farm | Ellenburg Depot, NY 12935 | $10,452 |
13 | Dimock Farms LLC | Peru, NY 12972 | $10,452 |
14 | Hidden View Farm LLC | Champlain, NY 12919 | $10,452 |
15 | Ducharme Dairy | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $10,452 |
16 | James Sample | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $10,392 |
17 | Furnace Brook Farm LLC | Peru, NY 12972 | $6,987 |
18 | Wayne Decoste | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $6,095 |
19 | Maplegrand Farms | Peru, NY 12972 | $5,906 |
20 | Jana Ashline | Chazy, NY 12921 | $5,637 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>