Total Commodity Programs in Clinton County, New York, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 82
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Clinton County, New York totaled $510,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bruce Trombley | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $4,147 |
22 | Todd Giroux Dba Giroux Family Farms | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $4,035 |
23 | Harrigan Brothers Dairy Farm | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $3,940 |
24 | Donald Boadway | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $3,760 |
25 | Michael Perrin | Ellenburg Depot, NY 12935 | $2,975 |
26 | Dean Spoor | Ellenburg Depot, NY 12935 | $2,865 |
27 | Danyelle A Trombley | Ellenburg Depot, NY 12935 | $2,836 |
28 | Terry Boyea | Altona, NY 12910 | $2,819 |
29 | Danny Ernest Manor | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $2,716 |
30 | Tammy Marie Manor | Ellenburg Ctr, NY 12934 | $2,716 |
31 | Pepin Farm, LLC | Merrill, NY 12955 | $2,661 |
32 | Paul Premo | Churubusco, NY 12923 | $2,562 |
33 | Bedard Farms | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $2,553 |
34 | Parker Family Maple Farm LLC | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $2,500 |
35 | Michael Dragoon | Altona, NY 12910 | $2,432 |
36 | Donald Gravelle | Chazy, NY 12921 | $2,339 |
37 | Full Throttle Sugaring LLC | Glens Falls, NY 12801 | $2,313 |
38 | Randy S Spoor | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $2,181 |
39 | Andre A Bedard | Mooers, NY 12958 | $2,128 |
40 | Michael T Leclair | Churubusco, NY 12923 | $2,123 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”