Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Clinton County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 201 to 220 of 268
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Clinton County, New York totaled $934,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
201 | Bradley Wright | Ellenburg Dep, NY 12935 | $463 |
202 | Leroy Upton | Mooers, NY 12958 | $450 |
203 | Keith Constable | Altona, NY 12910 | $450 |
204 | Wayne Lamb | Churubusco, NY 12923 | $434 |
205 | Brent A Trombly | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $432 |
206 | Michael B Oliver | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $423 |
207 | Howard I Laclair | Churubusco, NY 12923 | $419 |
208 | Willi Kalvaitis | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $414 |
209 | Michael Racette | Saranac, NY 12981 | $414 |
210 | Barbara Kalvaitis | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $414 |
211 | Donna Pearce | Peru, NY 12972 | $410 |
212 | Teresa F Jubert | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $395 |
213 | Victor Jubert | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $395 |
214 | Marilyn Dezan | Ellenburg Depot, NY 12935 | $387 |
215 | Mary H Tetreault | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $383 |
216 | Gene Brassard | Ellenburg Depot, NY 12935 | $374 |
217 | Steven Delaney | Cadyville, NY 12918 | $356 |
218 | Wayne Lapier | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $356 |
219 | James D Labombard | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $351 |
220 | Eugene G Guerin | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $347 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”