Counter Cyclical Program in Clinton County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 222
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Clinton County, New York totaled $1,120,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Bedard Farms | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $6,130 |
42 | Milton Labier | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $5,975 |
43 | Greg Labier | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $5,975 |
44 | Denis O Peryea | Altona, NY 12910 | $5,727 |
45 | Dba Long Ways Farm | Churubusco, NY 12923 | $5,707 |
46 | Henry Gooley | Champlain, NY 12919 | $5,550 |
47 | Donald Guay | Mooers, NY 12958 | $5,414 |
48 | J William Atwood | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $4,968 |
49 | Gerald Dumas | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $4,885 |
50 | John Duquette Jr | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $4,652 |
51 | Felix Tetreault | Champlain, NY 12919 | $4,566 |
52 | James Ashline | Rouses Point, NY 12979 | $4,540 |
53 | Wayne Decoste Dba | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $4,428 |
54 | Larry Ashline | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $4,405 |
55 | Scott Thew | Peru, NY 12972 | $4,063 |
56 | Jay Fischer | Watertown, CT 06795 | $4,036 |
57 | Alfred Kalvaitis | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $3,956 |
58 | Albert L Stickle | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $3,712 |
59 | C Wiley Colgan | Mooers, NY 12958 | $3,458 |
60 | Robert Gonyo Farms | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $3,359 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”