Farm Subsidy information
Clinton County, New York
Total Subsidies in Clinton County, New York, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 182
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clinton County, New York totaled $5,154,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Elizabeth Spaugh | Peru, NY 12972 | $5,102 |
82 | Chad Spoor | Ellenburg Depot, NY 12935 | $4,797 |
83 | G & M Farms | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $4,310 |
84 | Linda A Covel | Peru, NY 12972 | $3,876 |
85 | Richard Crawford | Morrisonville, NY 12962 | $3,571 |
86 | Jana Ashline | Chazy, NY 12921 | $3,444 |
87 | Timothy Vj Tender | Cadyville, NY 12918 | $3,105 |
88 | J William Atwood | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $2,947 |
89 | Smr Dyer Farms, LLC | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $2,884 |
90 | Georgie-ann's Dairy | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $2,867 |
91 | Balsam Creek Tree Farm LLC | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $2,488 |
92 | Michael Manor | Ellenburg Depot, NY 12935 | $2,445 |
93 | Glaude's Riverview Farm LLC | Ellenburg Ctr, NY 12934 | $2,444 |
94 | Maplegrand Farms | Peru, NY 12972 | $2,283 |
95 | Larry Rabideau | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $2,067 |
96 | Sunset Farm Ltd | Willsboro, NY 12996 | $2,019 |
97 | Full Throttle Sugaring LLC | Glens Falls, NY 12801 | $2,000 |
98 | Bobby Trombley | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $1,946 |
99 | Gary Dumas | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $1,943 |
100 | Richard Lamoy | Morrisonville, NY 12962 | $1,903 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”