Counter Cyclical Program in Clinton County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 222
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Clinton County, New York totaled $1,120,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Damour Acres | Churubusco, NY 12923 | $2,432 |
82 | Robert C Jarvis | Ellenburg Depot, NY 12935 | $2,404 |
83 | Gonya & Sons Farms | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $2,360 |
84 | Maple Summit Farm | Chazy, NY 12921 | $2,352 |
85 | Alton Or Roger Sample Partnership | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $2,274 |
86 | Harold Manor | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $2,266 |
87 | Terry Boyea | Altona, NY 12910 | $2,181 |
88 | Parker Family Maple Farm LLC | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $2,031 |
89 | Wayne Lapier | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $2,008 |
90 | Laurin Crest Farms | Chazy, NY 12921 | $1,952 |
91 | Napper Logging LLC | Saranac, NY 12981 | $1,942 |
92 | Dumas Farm | Mooers, NY 12958 | $1,929 |
93 | Delmont Acres | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $1,912 |
94 | Edmond Pellerin | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $1,832 |
95 | Jane Hagar-babbie | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $1,825 |
96 | James Normandin III Dba Carters-d | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $1,786 |
97 | Derrick Glaude Jr | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $1,774 |
98 | Bernard E Bosley | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $1,746 |
99 | Ronald Trombly | Mooers, NY 12958 | $1,737 |
100 | James T Vann | Morrisonville, NY 12962 | $1,679 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”