Loan Deficiency in Clinton County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 179
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Clinton County, New York totaled $2,953,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Maple Summit Farm | Chazy, NY 12921 | $3,227 |
102 | Wayne Deno | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $3,204 |
103 | Alton Or Roger Sample Partnership | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $3,141 |
104 | Bernard E Bosley | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $3,020 |
105 | Jana Garrant | Chazy, NY 12921 | $2,996 |
106 | Walter J Trombley | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $2,966 |
107 | Gerald Nichols | Churubusco, NY 12923 | $2,598 |
108 | Roger W Lamora | Cadyville, NY 12918 | $2,590 |
109 | Orville Lavalley | Ellenburg Depot, NY 12935 | $2,573 |
110 | James Normandin III Dba Carters-d | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $2,563 |
111 | J R's Dairy | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $2,514 |
112 | Brad A Mcdonald | Chazy, NY 12921 | $2,461 |
113 | Ellen Lamora | Cadyville, NY 12918 | $2,422 |
114 | Pombrio Brothers Farm | Altona, NY 12910 | $2,330 |
115 | Andrew J Hitchcock | Springville, NY 14141 | $2,226 |
116 | Carters-dale Farm | Ellenburg, NY 12933 | $2,140 |
117 | Daniel Fortin | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $2,129 |
118 | Teresa F Jubert | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $2,121 |
119 | Victor Jubert | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $2,121 |
120 | Martin Bolduc | Center Conway, NH 03813 | $2,013 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”