Total Conservation Programs in Clinton County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 148
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Clinton County, New York totaled $991,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Norbert A Kanzler | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $967 |
102 | Gerry-dale Farms | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $904 |
103 | Alton Seymour | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $892 |
104 | Todd Snide | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $892 |
105 | Maureen Snide | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $891 |
106 | Felix Tetreault | Champlain, NY 12919 | $864 |
107 | Kevin Brady | Churubusco, NY 12923 | $847 |
108 | Wayne Lapier | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $820 |
109 | Francis D Laclair | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $811 |
110 | Joe Giroux Farms | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $760 |
111 | Andrew J Hitchcock | Springville, NY 14141 | $760 |
112 | Melinda Carpenter | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $743 |
113 | Kevin Carpenter | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $742 |
114 | Theolus Trombley | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $740 |
115 | Laverne Trombley | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $739 |
116 | Miles Magoon | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $701 |
117 | Charles M Arthur | Peru, NY 12972 | $672 |
118 | Brent Smith | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $660 |
119 | G & M Farms | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $635 |
120 | William Harold Mccomb | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $626 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”