Total Commodity Programs in Clinton County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 784
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Clinton County, New York totaled $57,667,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Randy S Spoor | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $112,758 |
102 | Lynn John Deno | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $112,556 |
103 | Michael Manor | Ellenburg Depot, NY 12935 | $111,760 |
104 | Miles Magoon | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $109,524 |
105 | Todd Snide | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $108,379 |
106 | Joseph Garrant | Chazy, NY 12921 | $107,139 |
107 | Milton Labier | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $106,038 |
108 | James Normandin III | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $105,548 |
109 | Paul E Matott | Chazy, NY 12921 | $103,755 |
110 | Rolland D & Carolyn Guay | Champlain, NY 12919 | $102,335 |
111 | Carlton J Rabideau | Ellenburg Depot, NY 12935 | $101,782 |
112 | Daniel Fortin | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $99,916 |
113 | Michael Dragoon | Altona, NY 12910 | $98,829 |
114 | Racine Brothers | Champlain, NY 12919 | $98,664 |
115 | J William Atwood | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $98,459 |
116 | Richard Damour | Churubusco, NY 12923 | $97,600 |
117 | Sperry Brook Farm LLC | Mooers, NY 12958 | $94,106 |
118 | Robert C Jarvis | Ellenburg Depot, NY 12935 | $92,138 |
119 | Wayne Decoste Dba | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $91,768 |
120 | Donald Guay | Mooers, NY 12958 | $91,738 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”